80ZnZinc
Z:  
Z = 30N = 50
N:  

Setting ID1 Yield 2
[pps/pnA]
Measurement
date
Beam Target Brho01
[Tm]
F1 slit
L [mm]
F1 slit
R [mm]
Data from
115.25e-22017-11-01238U 345MeVBe 4mm8.271953.564.2 ---
123.13e+02016-11-09238U 345MeVBe 5mm7.596050.050.0 ---
136.16e+02016-11-09238U 345MeVBe 7mm7.843440.040.0 ---
141.68e+12016-11-09238U 345MeVBe 7mm7.723750.050.0 ---
582.65e+12015-11-04238U 345MeVBe 7mm7.322964.264.2 ---
1072.91e-42014-11-06238U 345MeVBe 4mm8.087064.264.2 ---
1082.27e-42014-11-03238U 345MeVBe 4mm8.087064.264.2 ---
1342.70e+02012-12-17238U 345MeVBe 3mm8.244042.864.2Phys. Rev. C 95, 051601R (2017)
2512.38e+12008-11-08238U 345MeVBe 5mm7.901064.264.2J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 073201 (2010)
2521.43e+12007-05-28238U 345MeVBe 7mm7.250021.021.0J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 083201 (2008)
2531.53e+12007-05-26238U 345MeVBe 7mm7.634042.042.0J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 083201 (2008)
2541.31e+12007-05-23238U 345MeVBe 7mm7.396021.021.0J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 083201 (2008)



Publication
Title Journal First Author
78Ni revealed as a doubly magic stronghold against nuclear deformationNature 569, 53 (2019)R. Taniuchi
Prominence of Pairing in Inclusive (p,2p) and (p,pn) Cross Sections from Neutron-Rich NucleiPhys. Rev. Lett. 122, 162503 (2019)N. Paul
Nuclear structure of 76Ni from the (p, 2p) reactionPhys. Rev. C 99, 014312 (2019)Z. Elekes
Inelastic scattering of neutron-rich Ni and Zn isotopes off a proton targetPhys. Rev. C 97, 044315 (2018)M. L. Cortés
Persistence of the Z = 28 Shell Gap Around 78Ni: First Spectroscopy of 79CuPhys. Rev. Lett. 119, 192501 (2017)L. Olivier
β-Decay Half-Lives of 76;77Co, 79;80Ni, and 81Cu: Experimental Indication of a Doubly Magic 78NiPhys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032505 (2014)Z. Y. Xu

Experiment
Proposal No. Spokesperson Start-Date End-Date Beam Course
NP1912-RIBF181R. Taniuchi2021-04-092021-04-16238U 345 MeV/u ZeroDegree
MS-EXP19-05H. Takeda2019-11-302019-11-30238U 345 MeV/u ZeroDegree


 Annotations:
1 Detailed BigRIPS setting is shown in the linked page.
2 The list of primary beam intensities is given in this page.
3 Error is only statistical one. Systematic error is estimated within 30%, which comes from uncertainly of primary beam intensity.


Return