Yeild

⁷⁴Ni	Nickel			Z:	≪	≫
⁷⁴Ni	Z = 28	N = 46		N:	≪	≫

Setting ID¹	Yield ² [pps/pnA]	Measurement date	Beam	Target	Brho01 [Tm]	F1 slit L [mm]	F1 slit R [mm]	Data from
11	1.98e-5	2017-11-01	238U 345MeV	Be 4mm	8.2719	53.5	64.2	---
12	2.42e+1	2016-11-09	238U 345MeV	Be 5mm	7.5960	50.0	50.0	---
13	8.08e-1	2016-11-09	238U 345MeV	Be 7mm	7.8434	40.0	40.0	---
14	1.12e+1	2016-11-09	238U 345MeV	Be 7mm	7.7237	50.0	50.0	---
58	3.94e+1	2015-11-04	238U 345MeV	Be 7mm	7.3229	64.2	64.2	---
134	1.72e-1	2012-12-17	238U 345MeV	Be 3mm	8.2440	42.8	64.2	Phys. Rev. C 95, 051601R (2017)
251	9.73e+0	2008-11-08	238U 345MeV	Be 5mm	7.9010	64.2	64.2	J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 073201 (2010)
252	8.49e+0	2007-05-28	238U 345MeV	Be 7mm	7.2500	21.0	21.0	J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 083201 (2008)
253	9.34e+0	2007-05-26	238U 345MeV	Be 7mm	7.6340	42.0	42.0	J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 083201 (2008)
254	7.56e+0	2007-05-23	238U 345MeV	Be 7mm	7.3960	21.0	21.0	J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 083201 (2008)

Publication

Title	Journal	First Author
Transition strengths in the neutron-rich 73,74,75Ni isotope	Phys. Rev. C 102, 014323 (2020)	A. Gottardo
Sequential Nature of (p,3p) Two-Proton Knockout from Neutron-Rich Nuclei	Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 012501 (2020)	A. Frotscher
Shell structure of the neutron-rich isotopes 69,71,73Co	Phys. Rev. C 101, 034314 (2020)	T. Lokotko
Prominence of Pairing in Inclusive (p,2p) and (p,pn) Cross Sections from Neutron-Rich Nuclei	Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 162503 (2019)	N. Paul
Inelastic scattering of neutron-rich Ni and Zn isotopes off a proton target	Phys. Rev. C 97, 044315 (2018)	M. L. Cortés
β-Decay Half-Lives of 76;77Co, 79;80Ni, and 81Cu: Experimental Indication of a Doubly Magic 78Ni	Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032505 (2014)	Z. Y. Xu

Experiment

Proposal No.	Spokesperson	Start-Date	End-Date	Beam	Course
NP1612-RIRING2-02	A. Ozawa	2021-04-16	2021-04-22	238U 345 MeV/u	Rare-RI Ring
NP1612-RIRING2	A. Ozawa	2018-11-04	2018-11-08	238U 345 MeV/u	Rare-RI Ring

Annotations:: ¹ Detailed BigRIPS setting is shown in the linked page.; ² The list of primary beam intensities is given in this page.; ³ Error is only statistical one. Systematic error is estimated within 30%, which comes from uncertainly of primary beam intensity.

Return