30NeNeon
Z:  
Z = 10N = 20
N:  

Setting ID1 Yield 2
[pps/pnA]
Measurement
date
Beam Target Brho01
[Tm]
F1 slit
L [mm]
F1 slit
R [mm]
Data from
362.24e+02015-11-2048Ca 345MeVBe 20mm8.3230120.0120.0 ---
441.28e+02015-11-1848Ca 345MeVBe 20mm7.491864.264.2 ---
473.96e+02015-11-1848Ca 345MeVBe 20mm7.245364.264.2 ---
981.32e+02014-12-1148Ca 345MeVBe 20mm8.3230120.0120.0 ---
1954.60e+02010-12-1548Ca 345MeVBe 15mm8.149264.064.0Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 317, 756 (2013)
2465.50e+02008-12-1348Ca 345MeVBe 15mm7.9185120.0120.0Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 317, 756 (2013)



Publication
Title Journal First Author
Border of the island of inversion: Unbound states in 29NePhys. Rev. C 105, 034301 (2022)M. Holl
Low-Z shore of the “island of inversion” and the reduced neutron magicity toward 28OPhys. Rev. C 95, 041301R (2017)P. Doornenbal
Intruder configurations in the ground state of 30NePhys. Lett. B 767, 58 (2017)H. N. Liu
Asymmetry dependence of reduction factors from single-nucleon knockout of 30Ne at ∼ 230 MeV/nucleonProg. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 083D01 (2016)J. Lee
Mapping the deformation in the "island of inversion": Inelastic scattering of 30Ne and 36Mg at intermediate energiesPhys. Rev. C 93, 044306 (2016)P. Doornenbal
Nuclear structure of 37,38Si investigated by decay spectroscopy of 37,38AlEur. Phys. J. A 51, 117 (2015)K. Steiger
Charge-changing cross sections of 30Ne, 32,33Na with a proton targetPhys. Rev. C 89, 044602 (2014)A. Ozawa
Measurements of nuclear radii for neutron-rich Ne isotopes 28−32NeNucl. Phys. A 834, 412 (2010)M. Takechi

Experiment
Proposal No. Spokesperson Start-Date End-Date Beam Course
DA16-01D. S. Ahn2017-03-302017-04-0248Ca 345 MeV/u ZeroDegree
NP1406-SAMURAI27N. Kobayashi2016-11-192016-11-2248Ca 345 MeV/u SAMURAI
NP0702-RIBF32-05H. Scheit2010-12-132010-12-1648Ca 345 MeV/u ZeroDegree
NP0702-RIBF08-02T. Otsubo2008-12-092008-12-1848Ca 345 MeV/u ZeroDegree


 Annotations:
1 Detailed BigRIPS setting is shown in the linked page.
2 The list of primary beam intensities is given in this page.
3 Error is only statistical one. Systematic error is estimated within 30%, which comes from uncertainly of primary beam intensity.


Return